The Urgency Of Trump Losing The Midterms, And Netanyahu Being Defeated In The Upcoming Israeli Parliamentary Elections

It is very clear to all sane people that it is urgent that Donald Trump and his Republican Party in Congress suffer major defeats in the upcoming Midterm Elections of 2026, this coming November 3.

It is the only hope to overcome the Fascist Authoritarianism and lack of concern about the mass population of America, that has been displayed by Donald Trump and his sycophantic Cabinet and Republicans in Congress.

Additionally, it is also urgent that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right wing alliance in the Israeli Knesset be forced out of power in October, which seems possible now.

A more moderate to leftist government is the only way the situation in the Middle East, including mass loss of life of Palestinians, can be ended.

Israel has lost a massive amount of support among many nations, as well as among a large portion of American Jews, and what Israel has done is promote virulent antisemitism in America and across the world, as their government and military have lost all sense of righteousness, decency, and compassion

And two extremist right wing ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, are highly dangerous as they have advocated total elimination of Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza, and should be facing war crimes trials, as what they promote is no different than Nazi Germany, a great irony.

For the future revival of ethics and morals of the Jewish People and Israelis, it is absolutely essential, also, for Benjamin Netanyahu to be prosecuted as well for his massive crimes against humanity.

Memories Of 9/11: Urgency In Never Forgetting Or Ignoring The Greatest National Tragedy!

September 11: Al Qaeda Attack on America:

846 AM—Flight 11 Strikes The North Tower of The World Trade Center

903 AM—Flight 175 Strikes The South Tower of The World Trade Center

937 AM—Flight 77 Crashes into The Pentagon Near Washington DC

959 AM—The South Tower Of the World Trade Center falls

1003 AM—Flight 93 Crashes In Shanksville, Pennsylvania After Passengers Launch A Counterattack On Hijackers Aboard The United Airlines Plane

1028 AM—The North Tower of the World Trade Center falls

The tragic loss of nearly 3,000 individuals still, 25 years later, is hard to fathom, and the sense of security and safety has deteriorated, and even more so under Donald Trump as he divides the nation and has undermined our national security, our domestic programs, our foreign policy, and our military, with the assistance of the most horrendous Cabinet members in all of American history.

The nation seemed to have united after September 11, but is now horribly divided in every way imaginable.

It is hard to believe in a future, when the potential for a Fascist authoritarian government is upon us, and the danger of another September 11, but far worse, looms upon the American people.

There is urgency in never forgetting or ignoring the greatest national tragedy, and resisting attempts to undermine the American future.

More Americans Are Identifying As Democrats, Than At Any Point Since 2006, 2008, 2018, And 2020!

Very encouraging news is that more Americans are identifying as Democrats before the upcoming Midterm Elections of 2026, than at any time since 2006, when Democrats won control of both houses of Congress under Republican President George W. Bush; 2008, when Barack Obama won the Presidency over John McCain; 2018, when the Democrats gained control of both houses of Congress in the midterms of the first Trump Presidency; and 2020, when Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump.

There is presently a ten point lead, which bodes well for, hopefully, good results on November 3, Election Day.

Three key groups–Latinos, young men, and young women have switched their support to the Democrats, after favoring the Republican in 2024.

A nine percentage point gain by Democrats among Latinos, and a 16 percentage point gain among young men and women, are major switches of loyalty, and hopefully, as in the past, will lead to Democratic control of Congress, and give an edge for the upcoming Presidential Election of 2028.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 2001-2026

The last four Presidents—George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden—saw more pro immigration policies, with the extreme exception of Donald Trump in both separate terms.

George W. Bush, similar to his father before him, promoted the general idea of the need for further immigration reform, but the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, caused him to promote extreme security measures due to the unprecedented crisis.

But Bush also supported the concept of the DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education For Alien Minors), which gave illegal immigrant minors the right to avoid being deported, but it suffered from great opposition from the majority of Republicans, so it only, finally, came to fruition under his successor, Barack Obama.

Under Barack Obama, the DREAM Act finally passed, and Obama also initiated by executive action the DACA program,(Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals), which by 2017, had registered 740,000 individuals.

Obama also tried to promote DAPA (Deferred Action For Parents Of Americans And Lawful Permanent Residents) from 2014 through 2016, but it was prevented by Republican opposition, and then dropped by Donald Trump in 2017. At the same time, Obama also had record deportations of undocumented immigrants, estimated at more than three million people.

Donald Trump, in his first term, worked to build an expansion of the Border Wall with Mexico; imposed a travel ban on people from a wide variety of nations, particularly outside of Europe and the Americas; dramatically reduced refugee admissions; and promoted family separations.

Many children were left without presence of their parents, while in detention before deportation. These policies caused massive outrage and resistance.

Under Joe Biden, Trump policies on immigration were reversed; there were increased refugee admissions to the nation; and there was restored DACA (Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals).

Upon Trump’s return to the Presidency, a totally anti-immigrant policy was pursued, including declaring a national emergency; promotion of greater border militarization with Mexico; and massive mass deportation operations, setting a goal of 3,000 immigrants per day to be arrested and sent to detention centers with horrendous conditions.

Major court cases led to lots of litigation to stop what was seen as a basic violation of civil and human rights, but with total determination by the Department of Homeland Security and the US Border Patrol to accelerate millions of immigrants being removed from the country, and with many being sent to nations they had no background in their earlier lives, and not having even the same language to be able to communicate.

Often citizens as well as undocumented immigrants, particularly those who are Latinos, or really, any person of color, have been removed, and the pace of deportation has accelerated, as the Trump Administration denies any mistreatment, and often ignores court decisions or lawsuits.

What the Trump Administration has done is the worst anti immigration policy since the internment of 125,000 Japanese Americans during World War II under Franklin D. Roosevelt; and Operation Wetback against Mexican nationals in the mid 1950s under Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1961-2001

From the 1960s to the turn of the 21st century, 8 Presidents pursued varying immigration policies.

All of the eight Presidents promoted pro immigration policies, a major change from earlier policies, with the exception of Bill Clinton.

John F. Kennedy advocated immigration reform, and opposed the discrimatory national origins system that had been in effect since the 1920s. He made attempts to advance serious reforms, but was stopped in his brief Presidency from accomplishing his open minded attitude toward immigration.

Lyndon B. Johnson advocated and signed into law the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, signing the new legislation in a ceremony at the Statue of Liberty, a massive reform that revolutionized migration of immigrants from around the world, as part of his “Great Society” programs. The National Origins formula since the 1920s was abolished, and a family based system was established.

The special preference for Northern and Western European migration was now expanded to include Southern and Eastern European, Latin American, Asian, and African immigration, vastly changing over time the demographic mix of the nation. This was seen as part of the changing political climate, in the time of the Civil Rights Movement of the era.

Richard Nixon generally pursued what Johnson had accomplished, and arranged for admission of Vietnam War refugees to come to America, and Gerald Ford continued the policies, including passage of the Indochina Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975.

Jimmy Carter continued the same pattern of openmindedness toward immigrants and refugees, including passage of the Refugee Act of 1980.

Further reforms occurred under Ronald Reagan, with amnesty for three million undocumented immigrants, under the Immigration and Control Act of 1986. In his Farewell Address in 1989, he applauded the importance and signicance of permitting immigrants into the nation as as advancement of America’s role in the world.

George H. W. Bush further expanded immigration reform, first promoted by Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, with passage of the Immigration Act of 1990.

This expanded legal immigration and promoted a diversity lottery, which included allowing migration of homosexuals, which had been prevented in the Johnson 1965 law.

Under Bill Clinton, with a Republican Congress in control in both houses for the first time in 40 years, restrictions on illegal immigration, under the Illegal Immigration Reform And Immigrant Responsibility Act in 1996, were put into place.

Deportation proceedings led to removal actions on a large scale. Bars to re-entry in the nation were instituted, and establishment of barriers on the US-Mexico Border were promoted.

So after more than three decades of immigration reform, new restrictions were being imposed in the mid to late 1990s.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1921-1961

Tragically, the four decades between the Presidency of Warren G. Harding until the end of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidency, saw the promotion of anti immigrant legislation and actions.

National Origins quotas were established in 1921, and then, under Calvin Coolidge, in 1924, a very restrictive immigration law, the Immigration Act, was passed.

The legislation strictly limited Catholic and Jewish immigration from southern and eastern European nations, and totally banned Japanese immigration, along with the continuation of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

This law would make it nearly impossible for Jews to escape Nazi Germany, and being denied admission to America, and Italians, trying to escape Fascist Italy, faced the same tragic fate, causing many millions of deaths.

The coming of the Great Depression in 1929 and after did not convince Herbert Hoover, who like his two earlier Republican predecessors in the 1920s, were totally isolationist and pacifist to the extreme extent.

Under Franklin D. Roosevelt, Executive Order 9066 in February 1942, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, authorized detention and internment of over 100,000 Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants during World War II, which was later authorized by the Supreme Court.

While some European immigrants were allowed in, Jews were not able to escape to America, and this contributed to the horrors of the Holocaust in Europe, which killed about 6 million Jews and 7 million others who wished to escape, but were unable to do do.

Even more horrendous was the Supreme Court case in December 1944, Korematsu V. US, which upheld the internment of the Japanese Americans as a militarily essential action of the federal government in wartime conditions, by a 6-3 vote.

It is considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in American history, and in 2018, in US V. Hawaii, the Supreme Court overruled the Korematsu decision, after 74 years.

However, on the same day as Korematsu, which divided the Court, the decision on Ex Parte Endo, all Japanese detainees were ordered released, a confusing situation created by the Supreme Court, one of its most degrading moments in its entire history.

Under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, the Japanese Americans who were still alive, gained reparations for their imprisonment, an action supported by President Ronald Reagan near the end of his time in office.

Under President Harry Truman, he vetoed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, but both houses of Congress passed it over his veto, in a time of the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism.

There were new restrictions on migration, particularly against those who professed Socialist or Communist beliefs, but also strict quotas on many people of different nationalities.

Finally, under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, mistreatment of Mexican nationals, which had gone on for decades, led to the derogatory term or slur “Wetback” being utilized in “Operation Wetback” in 1954-1955.

This led to deportation to Mexico of about 250,000 individuals by the US Border Patrol, a controversy much ignored since, but a stain on basic civil liberties, and a clearcut violation of human and civil rights.

Overall, under enforcement actions authorized by Eisenhower, over 1.1 million Mexicans were forcibly returned to Mexico by land and by sea in the year 1954, much beyond the actions alone of the US Border Patrol. And immigration quotas for all groups were strictly enforced in the Eisenhower Era.

So over these four decades from the 1920s to the end of the 1950s, overall, immigrants were treated very harshly, and without a sense of humanity—whether Asian immigrants; Jewish and Catholic immigrants; or Mexican and other Latin American immigrants.

This was a terrible violation of what the Statue of Liberty, which was given by France to the United States in 1886, promoted as the Open Door to America for those around the world who were escaping persecution and poverty, and seeking opportunity and a new lease on life in America.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1861-1921

This is the second of four entries on Presidents and Immigration Policies, covering the years 1861-1921, from Abraham Lincoln through the administration of Woodrow Wilson.

Under Abraham Lincoln, immigration was encouraged, with many immigrants, particularly German nationals, participating in Civil War military battles, and the Homestead Act of 1862 actively recruited immigrants.

The same pro immigration policies were pursued with the growth of industrial expansion, under Andrew Johnson, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and James A. Garfield.

Sadly, however in the Presidency of Chester Alan Arthur, anti Chinese hatreds led to the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882, the first major racial immigration restriction in American history, legislation that was renewed and continued as policy until American participation in World War II in 1943.

Grover Cleveland continued a similar policy and under Benjamin Harrison, the US Government established federal control of immigration, under the Immigration Act of 1891.

Similar restrictive policies toward Chinese and other Asian immigration continued under William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft with talk about “True Americanism” under Roosevelt.

Under Woodrow Wilson, restrictive immigration legislation on literacy tests was passed over his veto, amid growing fear of Catholic and Jewish immigration being perceived as a danger to America. And Wilson was very much a denier of basic civil liberties, and his open racism was made clear as promoting restrictions.

Tragically, massive restrictions on immigration and open anti Catholic and anti semitic beliefs would become dominant starting in the 1920s through 1965, the subject of the next entry on Presidents and Immigration Policies.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1789-1861

The issue of immigration has been a divisive part of American History from the beginning of the nation under the Constitution in 1789.

Between the Presidency of George Washington and James Buchanan (1789-1861), the general policy was Pro Immigration, with the major exception of John Adams’ Presidency 1797-1801, where the Alien and Sedition Acts were signed and enforced.

Then, that discriminatory legislation was repealed under his successor, Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), although Jefferson at times expressed concern about the trend of immigration expansion.

French immigration was the major issue that led Adams to support and sign limitations on immigrants, and enforcing a 14 year reqirement to apply for citizenship.

Later Presidents through James Buchanan encouraged immigration, although in the late 1840s and 1850s, there was growing nativism toward Catholic immigrants from Ireland and the German states.

This was based on fear of the Pope being a threat to the heavily Protestant religion of the vast majority of Americans.

So there were some urban riots and violence against the fear of Catholic migration.

The Problematical Senator John Fetterman, Who Could Prevent A Democratic Majority In The US Senate, Even If Democrats Gain Four Seats To A Majority

Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has become a growing problem for the party, as his commitment to his job as a Senator, and his commitment to the Democratic Party, is becoming an alarm bell.

Since Fetterman had a stroke in 2022 before the election for the Senate, and was in a mental hospital for clinical depression for two months in early 2023, his behavior and personality have changed dramatically, with former staff members claiming he has displayed erratic behavior.

Fetterman fails to meet his constituents in town halls or appear at important meetings inside and outside the Senate.

His behavior, including wearing inappropriate clothing (hoodie, sweatshirt and shorts) in the Senate and elsewhere, marks him as an oddity, and as a gadfly, and he has expressed discontent with the party that elected him to the Senate in 2022.

It makes many of his colleagues and many others to wonder if at some point, if the Democrats were to win a gain of four seats in November 2026, that he might switch parties to the Republicans, destroying the ability of Democrats to control the majority, and pursue their agenda and investigate the corruption, scandals, and power grabbing of President Donald Trump.

Many former Senate staff members have reported on his lack of interest in doing his job as a Senator, and have pointed out that his major goals seem to be to cultivate relationships with conservative media figures, and advocate for the Israeli government, despite their endless war against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

Fetterman has become an unreliable gadfly, and a “lone wolf” that reminds many of Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who often worked against their Democratic colleagues.

As Lieutenant Governor (2019-2023) under Governor Tom Wolf, he did not get along with the governor, and Wolfe continued to express issues with Fetterman’s behavior and poor approach in dealing with the Democratic Party and with constituents.

Newly elected Governor Josh Shapiro, since 2023, has also had issues with Fetterman and his unwillingness to conform to normal standards and interactions with his party and the state government.

Fetterman has often supported Donald Trump, on his pursuit of control of Greenland, and most notably, the Iran War.

There are at least three present or former members of the House of Representatives delegation, who are seen as potential challengers for Fetterman in the upcoming 2028 Senate race:

Conor Lamb (2018-2023) who lost to Fetterman in the Senate primary in 2022; Brendan Boyle since 2015; and Chris DeLuzio since 2023.

It seems certain there will be a primary battle for this Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2028, and the question is whether Fetterman will have switched to the Republican Party before that election, as he is seen as totally unreliable and unstable.

An All Time Record Of Eight African American Candidates For Governor In Midterm Elections Of 2026!

In the midst of the Trump Administration being involved in massive attacks on Civil Rights, an all time record of eight African American candidates to become Governors of their states are competing in the Midterm Elections of 2026.

Only three elected Democratic Governors have ever served—Douglas Wilder in Virginia (1989-1993); Deval Patrick in Massachusetts (2007-2015); and Wes Moore, finishing his first term as Governor of Maryland (2023-2027) and seeking reelection, and rumored to be a future Presidential contender in 2028.

Additionally, New York Lieutenant Governor David Paterson succeeded to the Governorship (2008-2010), after Governor Eliot Spitzer resigned due to scandals, that marred his brief Governorship, but Patterson had corruption issues arise, and he did not run to be elected in 2010.

Several African American candidates for Governor have lost, including: Democrats Stacey Abrams in Georgia to Brian Kemp in 2018 and 2022 and Shawn Wilson in Louisiana to Jeff Landry in 2023; and Republicans Daniel Cameron in Kentucky to Andy Beshear in 2023; Mark Robinson in North Carolina to Josh Stein in 2024; and Winsome Earl-Sears in Virginia to Abigail Spanberger in 2025.

In the 2026 Midterm Elections, there are five Democrats and three Republicans running for Governor, with several believed to be likely to win.

The most likely successes will be Wes Moore, running for relection in Maryland; David Crowley in Wisconsin; Aaron Ford in Nevada; and Keisha Lance Bottoms in Georgia, all Democrats; and Byron Donalds, in Florida, a Republican.

Republican John James in Michigan; Democrat Jermaine Johnson in South Carolina; and Republican Lisa Demuth in Minnesota are considered long shots, unlikely to win.